Subscribe to Job Alert
Join our happy subscribers
Never pay for any CBT, test or assessment as part of any recruitment process. When in doubt, contact us
Act for Change Consulting is a boutique consulting company based in Nairobi, Kenya but focusing on the provision of superior consulting services across Africa
The project works through solidarity groups as units of community entry and implementation. By 2022, 961 (M209, F752) members had been mobilized into 48 functional groups. In the course of implementation, the project had empowered targeted community members and had recorded several results:
The solidarity groups have accompaniers referred to as 'community animators' while the nurseries are managed by appointed community members called 'nursery managers'. The animators facilitate training of groups, offer close monitoring and ensure the implementation of the trained approaches. The animators also ensure that the groups are well coordinated; conduct trainings at group level and regularly conduct home visits to group members to ascertain progress of each group and each individual/member and address any emerging challenges. The community animators continuously visit the farms of their respective farmers to offer technical support and report on progress of each group on monthly basis outlining progress made and any challenges observed.
The project team constitutes of: Programme Coordinator who is also the CEO of the organization, a Project Officer, Technical Advisor - Agroecology, Project Accountant, Nursery Managers and Community Animators. They meet once monthly for reporting and planning and also exchange on challenges and lessons learnt.
PROJECT CONTEXT
The target project areas are characterised by good climatic conditions (soils & weather pattern) suitable for vegetable and fruit production, cash crop growing and livestock production. The area experiences two rain seasons with the main one running from March to July and the short rains September to October recording approximately 1400mm to 1800mm annually. Soils are well drained and characterized by shallow rocks. Despite these, the area has been impacted by effects of climate change due to deforestation and harmful farming practices that have resulted to increased soil erosion. Of late, the area has experienced recurrent hail stones which had been destroying crops.
Due to high inflation rate and difficult global economic situation, the country has experienced an increase in price of basic commodities and this has affected the well-being of the people targeted by the project as well as negatively affected the operations of the project. An increase in the cost of production means that the people can only produce less food further deepening the food crisis. The major crops grown are maize and beans mostly for home consumption but the surplus is sold. The Mt. Elgon people have been a farming community who continue trading away their produce at reduced prices to brokers and middlemen. According to Bungoma County Integrated Development Plan, poverty level in Mt. Elgon is estimated at 56 percent.
The socio-cultural aspect of the community is characterized by most men meeting in social clubs and outdoor activities while women mostly engage in domestic activities and economically productive work. They thus are like the heads of their households even though women are also subordinated in most homes and in community decision-making processes. The issue of land ownership and control of resource’s is still capitalised by men which to some extent affects production.
EVALUATION PURPOSE
The evaluation should in a very clear manner:
The primary users of the evaluation are:
This being an external evaluation, it is expected to comply with the international evaluation standards (OECD), provide a space for learning around best practices for supporting target communities. The evaluation will be undertaken in Elgon Ward with a sampling frame of 19 villages. Fastenaktion is seeking to identify a consultancy team, which will undertake this evaluation within the agreed terms of reference. Selection of the study sites will be agreed upon with the consultancy team. The consultancy team has to prioritize the field research questions in order to maximize on time. The evaluation process will include engagement with direct and indirect beneficiaries as well as other stakeholders.
In line with objectives of the evaluation, the evaluation will be expected to answer the following questions:
6.1 RELEVANCE
The evaluation should conduct an analysis of the appropriateness of the project design, activities, strategies and approaches in the light of the operational context, the timeliness of the response and its adaptation to the livelihoods security situations. It will involve assessing the extent to which the activities are suited to the priorities of the target groups, target households, and donors as well as the prevailing policy environment. Key questions to be addressed:
6.2 EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPACT
The focus will be on the extent to which project outcomes and objectives are being achieved. Key questions to be addressed:
6.3 EFFICIENCY
The evaluation will outline the extent to which the interventions have delivered, or are likely to deliver results in an economic and timely way. Key questions to be addressed:
6.4 SUSTAINABILITY AND LESSONS LEARNT
Within the scope of this assignment, the evaluator(s) should assess the extent to which the project interventions took into consideration longer term needs of the target population and to what extent project results or benefits will be sustainable after project closure. Key elements to be reviewed include environmental, operational and financial sustainability of the project. Key questions to be addressed:
6.6 ACCOUNTABILITY
6.7 GENDER
6.EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
The evaluator(s) is welcome to suggest an appropriate methodological approach to successfully deliver a quality evaluation. The evaluation methodology should be consultative and participatory, entailing a combination of desk review, key informant interviews, face to face household surveys, interviews and/or FGDs. While interviews are a key instrument, the evaluators will triangulate a range of data sources to ensure that the evaluation is sound and objective. The evaluator(s) will further elaborate on the method and approach in a manner commensurate with the assignment at hand and reflect this in the inception report, which will subsequently be approved by the programme team in consultation with key stakeholders.
A final agreement on the evaluation design and methodology will be discussed on the basis of the submitted offer and/or the inception report.
Some of the key primary data sources include:
Secondary data will be made available and it is expected that the evaluator(s) will have a comprehensive desk review of project documents. Some of the documents include project proposal and budgets, Log frame, baseline report, annual and quarterly reports, study reports among other as shall be deemed necessary by the evaluation team.
DELIVERABLES AND REPORING DEADLINES
The following deliverables are expected to be produced by the evaluation team:
The report will include a detailed plan of the evaluation process including a revised evaluation approach, an evaluation matrix stipulating for each evaluation question the data/methods that will be used, as well as the sampling method, data collection plan including methods and timelines, and feedback loops.
The tools should be developed in cooperation with Fastenaktion and the Partner organization. The field data collection should be informed by the evaluation objectives, evaluation questions and criteria. The survey tools and all raw data, statistical tables and coding lists (as appropriate), as well as transcripts have to be provided to Fastenaktion and the partner organization at the end of the evaluation. Data has to be disaggregated according to location and gender (minimum requirement). The evaluation team can decide to further disaggregate data in a way that improves answering of the evaluation questions.
The draft evaluation report is to be presented to the partner organization during a staff meeting to collect feedback. A PowerPoint presentation should be prepared for this purpose.
The final evaluation report shall incorporate the feedback from the partner organization and any other stakeholder. The PowerPoint presentation shall be adapted to these revisions.
SUGGESTED OUTLINE OF THE EVALUATION REPORT:
DISSEMINATION OF FINDINGS
After a validation and stakeholder workshop, the final report will be submitted to Fastenaktion headquarters for final review and endorsement by the Programme Development Unit. This process will declare the report to the donors and the wider public.
CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA
All documents and data collected will be treated as confidential and used solely to facilitate this evaluation. Interviewees and their pictures will not be quoted in the reports without their permission. It is expected that the evaluators will used consent forms as appropriate, and hand over to the project team. The deliverables as well as all material linked to the evaluation (produced by the evaluator(s) or the organization itself)is confidential and remains at all times the property of the contracting party.
TIMEFRAME AND REQUIREMENTS
The Evaluation should take 15 days preferably beginning from September 4th 2023.
DAYS |
TASKS |
RESPONSIBLE |
4 days |
|
|
5 days |
|
|
6 days |
|
|
EVALUATION TEAM COMPOSITION AND COMPETENCIES
The suggested team for this assignment includes:
The consultancy team should be mixed in gender.
INTELLLECTUAL PROPERTY
All the materials, information and reports, the output of the evaluation exercise shall be the property of Fastenaktion and the consultancy team is bound by Fastenaktion’s confidentiality requirements. All data sets and transcripts must be provided to Fastenaktion Coordination Office and Head Office in electronic copies and on a CD (2). The evaluators will not be allowed, without prior authorization in writing, to present any of the analytical results as his or her own or to make use of the evaluation results for private publication purposes.
LABOUR LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
The evaluation team commits itself to conclude (and any one contracted by the team) must commit to execute the contract in accordance with the local labour law, respect human rights, and not to allow discrimination based on gender, lifestyles, ethnic origin, religious affiliation or political opinions. The partner organization will not tolerate sexual or other abuse. The Fastenaktion Guideline on preventing and combating the abuse of power (2020) will apply to the contract.
Submission of Proposals
Based on the above, Fastenaktion is inviting interested parties to submit expressions of interest entailing technical and financial proposals. Individuals or firms applying shall detail the following:
All field visits costs including transport in the field, meals and accommodation during field work will be catered by the contracting agent.
Interested candidates should submit their application to the following email address: info@act4change.co.ke with “EXTERNAL EVALUATION, SOET 2023” as the subject of the e-mail. Deadline for submission is August 18th 2023
Kindly don’t forget to submit samples of your previous work (reference calls shall be made to validate your work)
Build your CV for free. Download in different templates.
Join our happy subscribers